Is a high score proof that the direction is correct?
No. The score tests communication and decision readiness. The underlying evidence still needs informed review.
Mood board quality checker and audit
Rate the board as a decision tool. The audit identifies structural gaps first, then produces a prioritized revision plan for review or handoff.
0out of 100
Rate the evidence
What the score can and cannot prove
Should every criterion receive full marks?
Not necessarily. A private working board can be rougher than a client or production handoff.
What should be fixed first?
Start with an unclear decision, missing evidence, or weak hierarchy because later polish cannot repair those gaps.
Audit decision readiness, not decoration
A mood board quality check tests whether a board can support a decision. The score covers brief alignment, evidence variety, visual hierarchy, annotation, source traceability, accessibility, and a clear handoff rather than surface polish alone.
Read the board from structure to polish
Rate the decision evidence
Check whether every major reference helps answer the stated brief instead of merely decorating the canvas.
Inspect hierarchy and duplication
Confirm the main thesis leads and repeated references have been edited down.
Review context and access
Add labels, source records, readable text, sufficient contrast, and alternatives to color-only meaning.
Resolve the lowest scores first
Use the generated priority list to fix structural gaps before adjusting minor visual details.
When an audit earns its time
- Pre-presentation review
- Design critique preparation
- Production handoff readiness
What this workspace produces
A weighted quality score with issue-specific recommendations and a prioritized revision checklist.
- Weighted seven-part audit
- Immediate score and readiness band
- Issue-specific revision plan
- Shareable audit record
- Account saving